Monday, 4 March 2024

Learn how the Building Safety Act, introduced post-Grenfell fire, is reshaping the landscape of tall building development in the UK. From reducing building heights to implications on affordability and urban planning, discover the far-reaching effects of this legislation.

In the wake of the Grenfell fire tragedy in 2017, the imperative to enhance fire safety regulations for high-rise residential structures became paramount. Subsequently, the Government announced in Summer 2023 a pivotal amendment to the Building Safety Act, lowering the threshold for mandatory second staircases in new residential buildings to 18 metres, approximately seven storeys in height. This revision marked a significant departure from earlier plans unveiled in late 2022, which had set the requirement for second staircases at buildings over 30 metres tall. Moreover, the Government disclosed a 30-month transitional period from the publication and confirmation of building safety guidance for the implementation of second staircases.

The implications of these new regulations on tall building development are profound. One notable effect is the reduction in saleable areas within schemes. Traditionally, developers aimed for around 80% of floor space as saleable, but with the necessity of second staircases and the ensuing additional corridor space, the ratio of saleable to circulation space is anticipated to decrease by approximately 5-10%. This adjustment could translate to substantial financial implications, with potential reductions in gross development value reaching £1-2 million per floor and possibly exceeding £15 million for an entire development, particularly in parts of London.

Consequently, developers facing decreased land values might seek compensatory measures, such as lobbying for reductions in affordable housing quotas or exploring options to diminish building heights below the 18-metre threshold. However, opting for taller developments presents its own challenges, including increased density and potential exacerbation of social issues. Such decisions not only influence the financial viability of projects but also impact urban planning and council revenues.

The legislation's ripple effects extend beyond financial considerations, affecting urban councils dealing with housing demands. Sites previously approved for taller buildings may no longer be viable, prompting councils to seek alternative solutions for housing needs. Moreover, developers navigating these changes may face criticism for under-development, even if their schemes align with financial optimisation and policy-compliant affordability standards.

In conclusion, the Building Safety Act is poised to fundamentally alter developers' strategies for tall building projects and reshape city skylines. Whether through height reductions, maximising footprints, or negotiating affordability requirements, this legislation heralds a new era in tall building development in the UK.

View the SOURCE here.

Our eNews provides regular insight into industry trends, news headlines, and product and service information. For more articles like this Subscribe to our enews.